
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Blog - Shellvoide | Bridging voids in Enterprise Security | Certified Cybersecurity Services</title>
      <link>https://shellvoide.com/blog/blog</link>
      <description>Welcome to our blog. Here we share our thoughts and insights on cybersecurity, technology, and more. You can get in touch with us for any cybersecurity needs at info@shellvoide.com</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <managingEditor>info@shellvoide.com (Shellvoide)</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>info@shellvoide.com (Shellvoide)</webMaster>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://shellvoide.com/blog/tags/deepseek/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://shellvoide.com/blog/blog/glm-deepseek-kimi-opus-pentest-benchmark</guid>
    <title>Low, Medium, Critical: How Four Frontier Models Graded the Same Live Target</title>
    <link>https://shellvoide.com/blog/blog/glm-deepseek-kimi-opus-pentest-benchmark</link>
    <description>We ran KLUE against the same live production target four times, once each behind GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2.7 and Opus 4.8, all on an identical thirty minute budget. Same target, same clock, four risk verdicts from Low to Critical. A field report on what each model sees, what it walks past, whether it got the severity right, and why the cheapest run came back with the most.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>info@shellvoide.com (Shellvoide)</author>
    <category>ai-pentesting</category><category>klue</category><category>benchmark</category><category>glm</category><category>deepseek</category><category>kimi-k2</category><category>claude-opus</category><category>ptaas</category><category>autonomous-security</category><category>appsec</category><category>pentesting</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
